News & Media

The funding gap nobody talks about

The funding gap nobody talks about
Published: Aug 2026

Most operating businesses live with a structural gap.

Customers pay on 60-day terms. Suppliers want 14 days. Payroll is weekly. The gap doesn’t disappear, it just gets managed. Quietly, expensively, by the operator’s own bank balance.

The reality of business cash flow

The gap looks the same across most industries. Customer payment cycle is measured in months. Supplier and staff costs run on cycles measured in weeks. The bigger the contracts the business wins, the bigger the gap gets, because tier-1 customers pay on tier-1 terms.

This isn’t a sign of a weak business. It’s a feature of how Australian commerce works in 2026. Construction, transport, manufacturing, mining services, agribusiness — they all run on it. The strongest businesses in those sectors live with the biggest gaps.

Why banks can’t help

Banks are built for stable, long-duration lending against predictable assets. Property is their happy place. Multi-year term loans against businesses with three years of clean financials are their second-happy place.

Bridge funding for a six-week gap doesn’t fit the bank’s product set. The credit committee won’t approve a short tenure against an operating asset. The compliance overhead is the same whether the loan is for three months or three years. It’s not in their interest to do small short bridges, even when they can.

Why cash flow lenders can’t help

The non-bank cash flow lenders fill some of the gap. They’ll do short tenors. They’ll settle quickly. But they price for the risk of unsecured lending against the P&L, which means rates that don’t survive a long-term relationship.

They’re also gated on the same diligence. P&L history, BAS statements, debtor ageing. If the business has a clean trading position, they’re an option. If something looks lumpy on the P&L, they’re not.

Why asset-based lending exists

The gap exists because the products built for it don’t quite reach it. Banks reach for too long, cash flow lenders reach for too expensive. The middle ground is asset-based.

Asset-based lending bridges short-term gaps at sensible rates because the underwriting is against the asset, not the P&L. The diligence overhead is lower. The risk is lower. The structure is purpose-built for the three-month bridge that’s killing too many otherwise-healthy businesses.

What it does that nothing else does

Three things, specifically:

  • It releases equity that’s already sitting in business assets, without forcing the business to refinance long-term loans against those assets.
  • It settles in days, not weeks, because the underwriting is on the asset.
  • It comes off when the loan is repaid, leaving the business’s longer-term lending position untouched.

Same shape as a home equity loan, but for business. The asset stays. The equity travels.

The gap’s been there for fifty years. The Big Four know it, they just don’t have a product that fits. We do.

Steve Heavey, Managing Director, Asset Based Lending
If you’re seeing the gap in your client base

Brokers who service operating businesses see this every week. Strong trading position, clean balance sheet, owned-outright assets, short-term gap, bank says no. That’s not a credit problem, that’s a product mismatch. ABL is the product.

Same principle, every deal

Got a client living with the structural gap?

If your client has a strong business, owned-outright assets, and a short-term cash gap that traditional finance won’t bridge, ABL is built for that. Free desktop valuation and a clear borrowing figure, all inside 2 hours. Same-day settlement when the asset is secured.

Share the Post: